This blog is intended for adults only and includes pictures, stories, and other materials that some viewers may find offensive. This was created by me, Solomon G, to convey my appreciation for works in the field of erotica. If you are under the age of 18, if this subject matter offends you, or if it is illegal to view such content in your community then please exit the site.
I was born in the mid-1970s and became a fan of busty women in my teens. It was a pivotal moment when I saw a 1991 episode of “The Sally Jessy Raphael Show.” That talk show featured surgically enhanced models Chesty Love, Europe Dichan, and Candy Cantaloupes, among other exceptionally endowed ladies. Beforehand, I naively assumed that the bustiest a woman could get, with the sole exception of country singer Dolly Parton, was a D-cup. It was a delightful epiphany to discover that there were beautiful women with significantly larger breasts. Previously accepted limitations were instantly disproved.
In the same vein, it was a crucial event when I first imagined people outgrowing their clothes and reaching heights far above their peers. This led to a lifelong appreciation for imaginative erotic tales and macrophilia. (Check out this post for a brief overview of macrophilia.)
My intent is to review size-fetish works and to promote my own stories. (Check this post for an outline of what works will be reviewed.)
Films have been reviewed for decades with arguably the two best known personalities being the late Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert. The duo created the television show “Opening Soon at a Theater Near You,” later called “Sneak Previews,” on America’s Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) in 1975 and created “At the Movies” in 1982 after they left PBS. Since then, the number of movie reviewers has greatly expanded. Now, there are a great many movie reviewers and even sites, such as Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, that aggregate (for better and for worse) their scores.
Furthermore, previously unexamined creations such as comic books, TV series, video games, etc. are now routinely critiqued and reviewed. For instance, YouTube provides a platform for creators like “Comic Book Girl 19,” “NerdSync,” and “Variant Comics” to give their opinions on comic books. Presumably, comic books were originally considered to be unworthy of such analysis. (NOTE: To be clear, previously feedback was given in the form of letters sent to publishers, some of which were published within letter columns. Additionally, “Wizard” magazine was created in July 1991 and reviewed comics.)
In a similar manner, pornographic sites are covered by places like “Porn Inspector,” “Rabbit’s Reviews,” and “The Best Porn.” However, those provide scant coverage of macrophilia. For instance, as of early November 2019, none of the three aforementioned sites have reviewed “Giantess Fan,” even though Giantess Fan has been producing unique content since the end of 2011. (NOTE: Rabbit’s Reviews and The Best Porn did cover Giantess Club.)
Therefore, I believe there is an unmet need for comprehensive reviews of size-changing erotica from a macrophilia fan. That said, I will keep in mind the following quote from Theodore Roosevelt Jr., the 26th President of the United States:
“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.”
Accordingly, credit should be given to those who create size-fetish material! When reviewing that material, I shall justify my analysis by providing evidence and examples. However, art is subjective, and not everyone will agree with my perspective. The intent is to help customers make an educated decision before they purchase, to highlight deserving creators, and to look back at older works and describe their impact.
If you enjoy this site and wish to support it, please consider purchasing my stories via Amazon or E-junkie. You can also make a donation below. If you can’t afford to provide financial assistance, but want to help out, then please tell others about this site. Lastly, and most importantly, thank you for checking out this blog!
Donate to support “There She Grows”
Thank you very much for your generosity. It enables the production of future reviews and additional content, and it’s greatly appreciated!